W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: WG meeting this week? [CANCELLED]

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:17:19 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20081021111312.03419c78@localhost>
To: "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Hi All,

Based on the replies, we will cancel this week's telecon.

Next telecon is per usual schedule:  +2 weeks, Thursday 6th November, 11am 
ET.  (Note:  I believe that the U.S. changes off of daylight time a few 
days before that, and I suspect Europe will have already gone off.)

Dave, nice to hear about your new hardware.  We'll add it to the next 
agenda -- a progress report on getting it CGX integrated!

Cheers,
-Lofton.

At 09:22 AM 10/21/2008 -0700, David Cruikshank wrote:
>I have no burning need for a telecon...
>
>Things are going well here.  Got a fancy defib installed yesterday.  It 
>also acts as a pacemaker and I can wave a bluetooth device over it to 
>upload activity directly to the drs office.  I'll work on encoding the 
>upload as .cgz or something.
>
>thx...dave
>
>On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Galt, Stuart A 
><<mailto:stuart.a.galt@boeing.com>stuart.a.galt@boeing.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hello all,
>>
>>I am in Budapest this week and have been having limited success using
>>the
>>phones and internet here.
>>
>>--
>>Stuart Galt
>>SGML Resource Group
>><mailto:stuart.a.galt@boeing.com>stuart.a.galt@boeing.com
>>(206) 544-3656
>>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Thierry Michel [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:27 AM
>> > To: Lofton Henderson
>> > Cc: WebCGM WG
>> > Subject: Re: WG meeting this week?
>> >
>> >
>> > Lofton,
>> >
>> > Regrets, I will not be able to attend as I am in WG meetings
>> > all week at TPAC.
>> >
>> >   Henderson wrote:
>> > >
>> > > All,
>> > >
>> > > Should we have a WG telecon this week, at our normal
>> > Thursday 11am ET
>> > > slot?  Or should we cancel this one (next one would then be
>> > two weeks,
>> > > Nov. 6th)?
>> > >
>> > > I don't see a lot to discuss.  Implementation and test work
>> > have been
>> > > lagging, and as a result comments (from WebCGM-ers) are light.
>> > >
>> > > Below I have listed the comments of which I'm aware.  They all seem
>> > > straightforward except [4], about which some discussion is still in
>> > > progress.
>> > >
>> > > Thoughts?  (And have I missed any comments?)
>> > >
>> > > -Lofton.
>> > >
>> > > [1] String limits:
>> > > 
>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm/2008Sep/0001.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm/2008Sep/0001.html
>> > > [2] WebCGMRect::union:
>> > >
>> > 
>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0000.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0000.html
>> > > [3] getObjectExtent:
>> > >
>> > 
>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0015.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0015.html
>> > > [4] CGZ:
>> > >
>> > 
>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0020.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0020.html
>> > > [5] [...in the TC, discussion/clarification about
>> > > set/getAttributeNS()...]
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2008 17:18:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 21 October 2008 17:18:25 GMT