W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > November 2008

[Minutes] WebCGM Telecon 2008-11-20

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:54:29 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20081120174952.02a25d48@localhost>
To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

WebCGM WG --

The minutes are at

http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2008/11/20-webcgm-minutes.html

and also available as text, below.

    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

                          WebCGM teleconference
                               20 Nov 2008

    [2]Agenda

       [2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0008.html

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-webcgm-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Dave C
           Thierry
           Dieter
           Don

    Regrets
           Benoit

    Chair
           Lofton

    Scribe
           Stuart

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]roll call 11:00am ET,
          2. [6]Al Gilman questions & remarks
          3. [7]LC Review completion and DoC
          4. [8]I18N comments
          5. [9]Active new threads:
      * [10]Summary of Action Items
      _________________________________________________________

roll call 11:00am ET,

    <lofton> Absent: Don, Dieter (LH: both joined later.)

    <lofton> Agenda:
    [11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/005
    1.html

      [11] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Nov/0051.html

Al Gilman questions & remarks

    Carry forward to next telecon. Everyone have a look.

LC Review completion and DoC

    Lofton suggests that we move the completion date out two weeks from
    today.

    resolutions of Issues 1, 2, and 3 (in the draft Disposition of
    Comments) can probably be endorsed today

    there were no objections to approving resolution of Issue #1

    there were no objections to approving resolution of Issue #2

    Issue #3: DoC's clarifying sentence about Style Properties is okay.
    Benoit's criticism of 'locus' remains open.

    Dieter pointed out that locus is not precise as used in the
    getObjExt text, because an APS can contain multiple drawn
    primitives, and various definitions of 'locus' seem more appropriate
    for single graphical primitives.

    Lofton said its usage needs to include all of the graphical
    primitives within the APS

    Dieter said it also doen't specify how to deal with rasters

    davec - says that it should be the extents of the raster "patch"

    Action item for someone who disagrees with the current wording to
    propose better wording

I18N comments

    I18N submitted some comments that are located
    [12]http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0811-webcgm/

      [12] http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0811-webcgm/

    I18N comment 1 is editorial. Proposed response (agenda reference
    [$1\47]) approved.

    I18N comment 2 will be clarified to remove the ambiguity. Proposed
    response (agenda reference [$1\47]) approved.

    I18N comment 3 is a reply to question. Proposed response to comment
    number 3 was approved (agenda reference [$1\47]).

    I18N comment 4 is about how to strip out whitespace. All agree with
    Lofton's proposed wording (agenda reference [$1\47]).

    I18N comment item 6:

    We think this means comparsions should be made in unicode

    <thierry>
    [13]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_normalization#Normalization

      [13] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_normalization#Normalization

    I was looking at [14]http://unicode.org/reports/tr15/

      [14] http://unicode.org/reports/tr15/

    <scribe> ACTION: Stuart will look at unicode normalization and try
    to figure out what it means [recorded in
    [15]http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-webcgm-minutes.html#action01]

      [15] http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-webcgm-minutes.html#action01

    <trackbot> Created ACTION-58 - Will look at unicode normalization
    and try to figure out what it means [on Stuart Galt - due
    2008-11-27].

    I18N comment 5:

    ISOLatin 1 is the default charater set

    lofton: ISOlatin1 is the WebCGM default character set. The majority
    of WebCGM content for which the normalization rules were designed is
    ISOLatin1. Which is why it was specifically mentioned. It was not
    our intent to limit it to only ISOLatin1 but in character sets that
    are very different from ISOLatin1 the rules might give odd results.

Active new threads:

    people need to comment on the open threads

Summary of Action Items

    [NEW] ACTION: Stuart will look at unicode normalization and try to
    figure out what it means [recorded in
    [16]http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-webcgm-minutes.html#action01]

      [16] http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-webcgm-minutes.html#action01

    [End of minutes]
      _________________________________________________________


     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.133
     ([18]CVS log)
     $Date: 2008/11/21 00:52:48 $
      _________________________________________________________

      [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
      [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 00:55:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 November 2008 00:55:50 GMT