LC comments summary

All --

Here is a compendium of LC Review comments for WebCGM 2.1.  We received 4 
comments altogether, all of which came from the CGM community.

We have recorded two of 'em here:
[1] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/03/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html

1.) SF limit should be bigger:
[2] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/03/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue1
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm/2008Sep/0001.html

2.) Name of the WebCGMRect::union method is problematic:
[4] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/03/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue2
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0000.html

And there are two more that are not yet recorded in [1]

3.) Wording clarification for getObjectExtent():
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0015.html

4.) Scope of normativity of gzip-compression requirement:
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0020.html

Regards,
-Lofton.