- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:02:23 -0700
- To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
All -- Here is a compendium of LC Review comments for WebCGM 2.1. We received 4 comments altogether, all of which came from the CGM community. We have recorded two of 'em here: [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/03/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html 1.) SF limit should be bigger: [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/03/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue1 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm/2008Sep/0001.html 2.) Name of the WebCGMRect::union method is problematic: [4] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/03/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html#Issue2 [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0000.html And there are two more that are not yet recorded in [1] 3.) Wording clarification for getObjectExtent(): [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0015.html 4.) Scope of normativity of gzip-compression requirement: [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0020.html Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2008 22:03:23 UTC