W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > August 2008

Re: p.s. Re: " PLH: Prefer 22nd Sept, comm team busy"

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:01:34 +0200
Message-ID: <48B8397E.8040705@w3.org>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>, W3C Comm Team <w3t-comm@w3.org>


Ian has agreed to publish the WebCGM 2.1 WD on the 17th Sept.
This is  much better than the 22nd, as I will not be away.

So 17th Sept fits the Comm team, the WebCGM Group.
PLH has given it approval for the shortname.

We will register during our telecon on the 11th sept that the WebCGM is 
OK for moving to LC.

Then I will send a transition request (with the link to the minutes) on 
the 11th sept.

PLH said he will give approval of the Transition very quickly.

If we keep this schedule, we will be Ok for the LC review period and for 
our F2F to discuss these comments in November.

Lofton, please send the "Pre announcement for WebCGM 2.1 to a First 
Public and  Last  Call Working Draft" to chairs with following 
publication date of 17sept and end of LC review on 07 Nov.



  Henderson wrote:
> HCG minutes:  
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-html-cg/2008JulSep/0083.html
> At 09:06 AM 8/29/2008 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>> Hi Thierry (& all) --
>> I have been listening on the HCG telecon.  (All ... that's Hypertext 
>> Coordination Group, of which WebCGM is a member.)
>> The agenda came to "Other pending Last Calls."  I mentioned our 
>> plan/desire for 15th September.  Philippe requested 22nd instead.  I 
>> said that it should work, but I would check with you first, because 
>> you would be gone starting the 18th.
>> Chris & Philippe said that should be no problem, if we have the 
>> document all ready to go before you leave.  (I think that's right, and 
>> I think it will be ready.)
>> One other suggestion:  it was Al I think who suggested that the LC 
>> announcement should call out how the 2.0-to-2.1 differences are 
>> highlighted in the spec:  the "What's new..." appendix, the Change 
>> Log, and the in-line styling (if I succeed to do that next week).
>> So does 22nd Sept sound okay to publish FP&LC WD?
>> (I am holding on the pre-announce till I hear about this.)
>> -Lofton.
Received on Friday, 29 August 2008 18:02:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:40 UTC