RE: WG assignments -- WebCGM 1.0 Errata review

E08 and E09 look ok to me.

--
Stuart Galt
SGML Resource Group
stuart.a.galt@boeing.com
(206) 544-3656

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] 
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 9:07 AM
> To: WebCGM WG
> Subject: WG assignments -- WebCGM 1.0 Errata review
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I want to make a small assignment for each WG participant, to 
> be completed before the Thursday telecon.
> 
> I realize that the 1.0 errata document [1] has grown to be 
> bulky, and it may be daunting if you're busy.  Therefore, I'd 
> like to have each person review two errata, okay?
> 
> To remind you of present status... The WebCGM WG approved the 
> substance (and Class) of all of the errata solutions at the 
> 8/30 telecon [2] (and the WebCGM TC approved the same 
> substance earlier at its f2f).
> 
> So your job is to check that the completed text in the 
> document [1] correctly implements our approved resolutions, 
> and to check for editorial errors.
> 
> Chris -- E01 (URI/IRI)
> Dieter -- E02, E03
> Benoit -- E04, E05
> Dave -- E06, E07
> Stuart -- E08, E09
> Don -- E10, E11
> 
> It would be good to email your review ("okay" or 
> corrections), especially if you will not be present Thursday. 
>  Feel free to review other ones in addition to your assigment.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> -Lofton.
> 
> At 04:09 PM 9/6/2007 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
> 
> >WebCGM WG --
> >
> >This should implement all of the decisions that we made at the 8/30 
> >telecon (and before):
> >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-
> errata-200
> >70621.html
> >
> >It is ready for final editorial approval, which we will do 
> at the 9/13 
> >telecon.  Please have a careful look at it before then, and send any 
> >comments to this list.  Are there any substantial errors in 
> >implementing our decisions?  Any editorial corrections?
> >
> >After approval, it will have a 4-week (public) review, as it 
> contains a 
> >couple of Class 3 corrections.
> >
> >Regards,
> >-Lofton.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
>