Okay, I made the update, http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-20/WebCGM20-errata-draft.html -Lofton. At 09:12 AM 10/10/2007 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote: >Lofton Henderson wrote: >>I think the header of the 1.0 errata document needs a small fix. Our >>current approved WG draft is: >>[1] >>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-20070621.html >> >>It defines "This version:" to be: >>[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/WebCGM10-errata.html >>However, the WebCGM 1.0 2nd Release header section links to a different >>URL [3] for its errata page. >>[3] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM-20011217-errata >>It seems to me that "This version" in the 1.0 errata document must be [3] >>instead of [2], correct? > >Yes >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM-20011217-errata >is the proper URI. > > >Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 13:30:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:10 GMT