W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > October 2007

RE: 2.0 Errata review -- WG assignments

From: Cruikshank, David W <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:57:53 -0700
Message-ID: <740D2CE97CEE6D4592D28C8B965280F708006908@XCH-NW-4V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

I complete my review of E04 and it looks good...

Thx...Dave 


Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange
Boeing Commercial Airplane
206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734
david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:47 PM
To: WebCGM WG
Subject: 2.0 Errata review -- WG assignments



Hi All,

Repeating what we did with the 1.0 errata, I'd like each of you to take
a close look at 2.0 errata.  Since there are only six of 'em, you are
only
*responsible* for one, as below.

However, we want to obtain WG approval of the 2.0 errata collection at
our next telecon.  This means that you should familiarize yourself with
the six of 'em before then.

Today we discussed and decided -- based on our light WG workload, known
travel plans, and avoiding conflict with TC work schedule -- that the
next telecon should be 11th October.

Dieter -- E02
Benoit -- E03
Dave -- E04
Stuart -- E05
Don -- E06
Thierry -- E07

It would be good to email your review ("okay" or corrections) to the WG
list.

Thanks in advance,
-Lofton.

[1]
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-20/WebCGM20-errata-draf
t.html
Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 16:58:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:10 GMT