In an earlier thread, Thierry wrote about a proposed "status" addition to the errata documents... At 05:29 PM 9/21/2007 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote: >"These corrections are proposed by the WebCGM Working Group, which has >consensus that they are appropriate; they are not to be considered >normative until approved by a Call for Review of Proposed Corrections or a >Call for Review of an Edited Recommendation" Ian Jacobs confirmed that it was right and appropriate to have this in the errata documents. I have updated our two draft internal errata documents accordingly: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-20/WebCGM20-errata-draft.html http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-20070621.html See the new header section "Status of the errata", and see the new 6th bullet in the bullet list at the start of the header section. Comments welcome. -Lofton.Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 21:50:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:10 GMT