W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > November 2007

RE: WebCGM 2.1 Timeline

From: Cruikshank, David W <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:35:39 -0800
Message-ID: <740D2CE97CEE6D4592D28C8B965280F7087E7AE5@XCH-NW-4V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
To: "Thierry Michel" <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

My only concern was that we don't have an MOU between OASIS and W3C that
covers a joint working relationship.  Remembering the effort that went
into the scope of the current MOU is painful, so an annex is needed and
carefully written.

Thx...Dave


Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange
Boeing Commercial Airplane
206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734
david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry Michel [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:31 AM
To: Cruikshank, David W
Cc: Lofton Henderson; WebCGM WG
Subject: Re: WebCGM 2.1 Timeline

Cruikshank,

WebCGM 2.0 was a Committee Specification from the WebCGM TC. OASIS which
was submitted to the W3C using the normal W3C Submission process. The
submission to W3C was acknowledged, and W3C created the WebCGM Working
Group. The group started the recommendation track with of a first and
Last Call WebCGM 2.0 Working Draft. It then produced a CR, PR and
finally a Recommendation.

My understanding is that for our new work,WebCGM 2.1, there will be no
submission to W3C. The work will be done jointly with OASIS and there
will a W3C first Working Draft by 15 April 2008, followed with a Last
Call WD by 01 July 2008 from an initial OASIS Committee Draft.

Also, Section 5 of the Mou [1] says:

"OASIS and W3C reserve the right to employ the process and agreement
established with this MoU for future versions of WebCGM, by providing an
annex with the reserved name and version, signed by the President of
OASIS and W3C's chairman or Chief Operating Officer."

Therefore we should ask for such annex.


[1] http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/01/w3c-oasis-cgm-final-051215.pdf



  David W wrote:
> Thierry,
> 
> Looking through the milestones in out charter, I was a little confused

> about the working draft in April.  Looking back at the MOU between 
> OASIS and W3C, we didn't (don't?) submit anything formally to W3C 
> until we get to "Committee Specification" in OASIS and that went 
> directly to LC Draft in W3C.  Are we doing the same thing this time?  
> We invited certain W3C members (Chris) to review the OASIS Committee 
> Draft during the OASIS public review cycle. If we are really going to 
> try to have a W3C First Working Draft, we are already well behind the 
> schedule on the OASIS side.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Thx...Dave
> 
> 
> Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial

> Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry Michel [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 12:57 PM
> To: Cruikshank, David W
> Cc: Lofton Henderson
> Subject: Re: WebCGM 2.1 Timeline
> 
> David,
> 
> 
> For the W3C side, we are shooting for Publish Last Call Working Draft 
> -
> 01 July 2008.
> 
> see milestones
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/webcgm-charter.html#milestones
> 
> Thierry.
> 
> Cruikshank, David W wrote:
>> I'm getting back to doing something here.  Remind me.  What were we 
>> shooting for in June of 2008?  CD in OASIS or something in W3C?
>>
>> Thx...Dave
>>
>> Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing 
>> Commercial
> 
>> Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com
>>
> 
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2007 16:37:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:10 GMT