W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > May 2007

Re: AW: WG telecon non-participation

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 10:53:14 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20070527105213.03fd90e0@localhost>
To: "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

We will proceed with option a.).  Stay tuned for "Poll" message and please 
respond promptly, to list.

-Lofton.

At 01:00 PM 5/24/2007 -0400, Weidenbrueck, Dieter wrote:

>I agree with Benoit, a) would be best.
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von
> > Bezaire, Benoit
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 18:50
> > An: WebCGM WG
> > Betreff: RE: WG telecon non-participation
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > My intent was to participate in the call, but additional
> > (important) work related telecons showed up in my schedule
> > today. That's why you didn't see any regrets from me, sorry.
> >
> > Option a) is easier for me.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Benoit.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lofton Henderson
> > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 11:36 AM
> > To: WebCGM WG
> > Subject: WG telecon non-participation
> >
> >
> > Don, Benoit, Thierry, Dieter, Chris --
> >
> > You are listed as members in good standing:
> > http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=39256
> >
> > Three showed up for telecon, 5 did not, 0 regrets.  (I know
> > about Chris, and Dieter indicated several weeks ago that he
> > might have a recurring Thursday problem.)
> >
> > Therefore we could not endorse the extension request as
> > planned.  We have done it in a loose fashion by email, but
> > that probably doesn't suffice.  What should we do now?
> >
> > a.) email straw poll (I could summarize w/ URI's of replies)
> > b.) telecon 1 week from today (5/31)
> > c.) quit
> >
> > In next email, I will propose a revised draft extension
> > request, which I hope will remove any of the possible
> > pitfalls that Chris warned about earlier.
> >
> > -Lofton.
> >
> >
Received on Sunday, 27 May 2007 16:53:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:10 GMT