W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: AW: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 15 February 2007

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:25:10 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20070215071837.02013e10@localhost>
To: "Weidenbrueck, Dieter" <dweidenbrueck@ptc.com>, "Bezaire, Benoit" <bbezaire@ptc.com>,"Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
Cc: "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

It works better for me also.

Postponed.

I'm open to searching for a new regular time/date.  But for next week, 
let's try to work around the normal Thursday slot and see if a small 
adjustment would let Chris attend.

-Lofton.

At 08:41 AM 2/15/2007 -0500, Weidenbrueck, Dieter wrote:
>same here, next week would be better.
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von
> > Bezaire, Benoit
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Februar 2007 14:36
> > An: Lofton Henderson; Chris Lilley
> > Cc: WebCGM WG
> > Betreff: RE: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 15 February 2007
> >
> >
> > Postponing until next week works for me!
> >
> > Actually, would another day than Thursday be better for the group?
> >
> > Benoit.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lofton Henderson
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:03 PM
> > To: Chris Lilley
> > Cc: WebCGM WG
> > Subject: Re: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 15 February 2007
> >
> >
> > At 07:22 PM 2/14/2007 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:
> > >On Wednesday, February 14, 2007, 7:01:58 PM, Lofton wrote:
> > >[...]
> > >LH> Main topic: some initial discussion about how to go forward with
> > >LH> errata.  Chris's presence would be a bonus.
> > >
> > >I have a conflict; there is a staff meeting every week now,
> > at the same
> >
> > >time as the WebCGM call.
> >
> > I wonder, would it make sense to postpone the telecon till
> > next Thursday, when you (or Thierry) might be available?  As
> > it stands, I'm a bit rushed trying to finish some clarifying
> > conversations on the OASIS side.
> >
> > Also ... I have noticed in the OASIS-side conversations that
> > some aspects of this take a *lot* of email to sort out what
> > would probably settle in 1/4
> > - 1/2 hour of conversation.
> >
> > If you have a regular conflict, we could start any time in
> > the 11-1230 ET window, or could even move the call forward by
> > 1/2 hour.
> >
> > >[...]
> > >However, I am happy to answer any erratta process questions
> > in email,
> > >ahead of the call.
> >
> > I'll send one of the simpler ones along soon, in a separate message.
> >
> > -Lofton.
> >
> >
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 14:25:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:10 GMT