W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > February 2007

RE: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 15 February 2007

From: Bezaire, Benoit <bbezaire@ptc.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:36:19 -0500
Message-ID: <B0D4682CF6F84041AC7C42AA6E9E81330532AAAD@HQ-MAIL3.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
Cc: "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

Postponing until next week works for me!

Actually, would another day than Thursday be better for the group? 


-----Original Message-----
From: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lofton Henderson
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:03 PM
To: Chris Lilley
Subject: Re: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 15 February 2007

At 07:22 PM 2/14/2007 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:
>On Wednesday, February 14, 2007, 7:01:58 PM, Lofton wrote:
>LH> Main topic: some initial discussion about how to go forward with 
>LH> errata.  Chris's presence would be a bonus.
>I have a conflict; there is a staff meeting every week now, at the same

>time as the WebCGM call.

I wonder, would it make sense to postpone the telecon till next
Thursday, when you (or Thierry) might be available?  As it stands, I'm a
bit rushed trying to finish some clarifying conversations on the OASIS

Also ... I have noticed in the OASIS-side conversations that some
aspects of this take a *lot* of email to sort out what would probably
settle in 1/4
- 1/2 hour of conversation.

If you have a regular conflict, we could start any time in the 11-1230
ET window, or could even move the call forward by 1/2 hour.

>However, I am happy to answer any erratta process questions in email, 
>ahead of the call.

I'll send one of the simpler ones along soon, in a separate message.

Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 13:38:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:39 UTC