- From: Don Larson <dlarson@cgmlarson.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:05:58 -0500
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton, I Agree. Don Larson. > For the four of you who were not at today's telecon, we need your approval > of the 1.0 errata processing strategy that the four attendees tentatively > approved. > Long story short, we believe that publication of a reviewed Errata document > will suffice, and that publication of a 1.0 Third Release is neither > necessary nor desirable -- in fact it might be painful to align that > six-year-old document with current pubrules. Details... > Today's minutes: > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2007/08/30-webcgm-minutes.html > Please search for the string "publish a new" and start reading at that > line. It details our rationale, and also presents the case that the > decision is acceptable under W3C Process and the WebCGM WG Charter. > Question (for today's absentees): do you agree? > Please reply to this message, Cc: to the WebCGM WG list. > Regards, > -Lofton.
Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 15:04:00 UTC