- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:15:50 +0200
- To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, public-cdf@w3.org
- Cc: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:19:20 +0200, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> wrote: > We wonder if you have had any thoughts about this question, that you can > share with us graphics people? The reason it was removed, iirc, was that it was specific to HTML and SVG and not at all generic as the framework should be. > At 03:54 PM 7/20/2006 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: > >> Hello public-cdf, >> >> Looking at "Compound Document by Reference Framework 1.0" (LCWD of Dec. >> 2005), the WebCGM WG found the section [1] on linking and child >> documents to contain particularly interesting and valuable informative >> material. >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#link-activation-child-documents >> >> We noticed, in the current editors draft [2] (June 2006), that this >> material is missing. (In fact, sections 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 are missing.) >> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/cdf.xhtml >> >> We are wondering if this is an intentional removal, or rather whether >> maybe this is just a transient development stage of the document that >> we're seeing? >> >> (Not speaking for SVG ... but as a participant of the SVG WG, I would >> voice the same opinion -- valuable material -- because these >> link-target details have progressed alternately and together in the two >> specifications, WebCGM and SVG.) >> >> Best Regards, >> Lofton Henderson >> (Chair WebCGM WG) >> >> >> >> >> > > -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 06:47:27 UTC