W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > June 2006

Re: process and milestones for moving WebCGM 2.0 to LC.

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 09:10:34 +0200
Message-ID: <44867BEA.4040009@w3.org>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
CC: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org


Your adding is fine if you think it is necssary to clear up the status 
of this FPWD.

Henderson wrote:
> I realize that this might have been a little hard to parse and understand...
> At 03:27 PM 6/6/2006 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>> [...]
>> I was just about to hit 'send' on the "WebCGM 2.0 Last Call Review 
>> Schedule" to Chairs and dependency WGs.  But then I'm thinking... 
>> should that (LCWD) follow the FPWD Transition Request, which is also 
>> Cc: to Chairs?  Or maybe, to preempt confusion, should I put a note in 
>> LCWD message (then send it) acknowledging the odd order of things when 
>> FPWD and LCWD coincide, and preview that FPWD Tr.Req. message will 
>> follow soon?  Or not worry about it at all?
> So what I was proposing in the 2nd option ("to preempt confusion") is 
> augmenting the 3rd paragraph of the letter, which currently reads:
> [[[
>     This LC Working Draft is based, in large part, on a work by the same
>     name, WebCGM 2.0 an OASIS Committee Specification [2] submitted to
>     W3C as WebCGM 2.0 Submission[3]. This Member Submission is related
>     to the previous W3C work on WebCGM 1.0 [4], and draws on experiences
>     with that format from implementors and users over five years. This
>     Working Draft incorporates feedback and discussion following the
>     Submission. 
> ]]]
> by adding for example, "(Note.  Because of the relatively unusual way 
> that this entered the W3C Process, you will also soon be seeing a First 
> Public WD Transition Request.)"  Then send it without waiting for the 
> telecon, resolution, minutes, and FPWD request.
> Yes?  No?  Other?
> -Lofton.

Thierry Michel
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2006 07:10:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:38 UTC