- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 09:17:55 -0600
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>,public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
At 08:14 PM 6/1/2006 +0200, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >Lofton, > >I have edited a conforming Cover page and SOTD for WebCGM 2.0 LC version. >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/20060528/proposed-changes-boeing/cover.html >Following are the changes I have done > >--- Header section ---- > >- Modified the Title >- Modified Working draft mention >- added LC WD CSS style sheet >- Modified "This version" link" >- Modified "Latest version" link >- REmoved "Previous version" link > >Added non normative zip format link >Added W3C Copyright statement > >--- Abstract section ---- > >no modification. > >--- Status of this Document section ---- > >- Deleted and rewritten this section with conforming statement. (still >need to state the final end of review date). >Need also to create a public mailing list public-webcgm-comments@w3.org> >to collect LC comments Do we need that list? What about the list public-webcgm@w3.org? If that does not suffice for LC comments, then I'm sure what it is for. >--- Notices section ---- > >- Deleted this section. >Do we need to have it in the spec ? >if yes it should be moved end of the document. To me, it doesn't appear appropriate for the W3C version of the spec, and it doesn't seem to be required by MoU (whereas OASIS Copyright is required.) If you have any doubts, perhaps a *quick* check with Rigo. >--- Table of Contents section ---- >no modification. > > >You should include this cover page into your document. Done. By the way, I am still unable to write to WebCGM area with jigedit. Should we check whether something is wrong? This is 10 days after "... should take a few days at most a week." -Lofton.
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 15:33:30 UTC