- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:58:43 -0600
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
At 12:01 PM 7/31/2006 +0200, Chris Lilley wrote: >On Sunday, July 30, 2006, 6:52:24 PM, Lofton wrote: > >LH> Okay, here is a first-cut at composite ICS: >LH> >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/2006/draft-ics-10-composite.html > >LH> This is based on results reported by 4 implementers in Apr-May >2003. I did >LH> a little adjustment of the reported results of ITEDO -- they gave the >LH> reasons for "No" answers so I was able to check against present Beta. > >So the only area that doesn't have two passes is 'Line elements and >attributes' (I hadn't expected problems in that area) Yes, I was surprised by that category as well. >and its just a case of improving results on three tests? Sort of. Recall that the Y/N is the granular answer for the whole group of tests -- NO on a single test means NO for the whole category. I would expect, given the particular tests in question (that "d" said were problemantic), that there are 2-3 YES from others. Indeed, for example, a quick check just now of the two linestyle tests shows that two others "Pass". So what we need now is the test-by-test report. I'm preparing that big matrix and preparing to ask the venders to fill it in. Cheers, -Lofton.
Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 13:58:41 UTC