W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > December 2006

[ACTION] straw poll about 11/21 telecon

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:47:12 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

All --

I haven't heard a compelling reason from anyone, whether we should proceed 
with 11/21 telecon (or not).  I have another demand competing for that time 
slot (as I'm sure you all do, at this busy time), but if people opt for a 
telecon then I'll be there.

So let's decide ...

STRAWPOLL:  Please write back (to list or to me) and tell me your 
preference, YES or NO.  Majority wins (unless someone points out a 
compelling reason that we should go with YES).

FWIW, as I see the PR and testimonials liaison unfolding, it would appear 
that it can be handled by email.  That would include:  a status report or 
update to the WG; and badgering WG members to produce their testimonials.


P.S.  The other potential topic is "what next" (for the next 5 months).  I 
would like to see some email discussion on possibilities [1], before it's 
on a telecon agenda.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/0026.html

At 09:18 AM 12/14/2006 +0100, Thierry Michel wrote:

>Cruikshank, David W wrote:
>>It's not our WG internal request I'm talking about.  During our telecon
>>with Janet and Carol I heard something about the organizationa going out
>>with requests to their member companies for testimonials.
>Janet and Carol should be collecting Testimonials and drafting the Press 
>I have ping Janet at our meeting in Japan. She said she will come back to 
>us shortly.
>>I've working our testimonial through the process here at Boeing.. I just
>>expected to be formally asked for one from W3C or OASIS.
>Good to hear that you have lunch the process at Boeing.
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2006 23:47:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:39 UTC