- From: Cruikshank, David W <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:44:59 -0800
- To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
I guess, it might be ok to have a short telecon to touch base, but it's unlikely that we can do any business until we get through all WebCGM processing. Thx...Dave Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com -----Original Message----- From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 6:55 PM To: WebCGM WG Subject: CORRECTION -- Re: next WebCGM telecon 22-dec? Sorry, the proposed next telecon date was Thursday, 21st December (not 22nd)... At 10:47 AM 12/11/2006 -0700, Lofton Henderson wrote: >All -- > >The minutes omitted ... when should be the next WG telecon? The three >present on 7-dec thought that 22-dec might be a good idea. If not then >... then it won't happen till after the first of the new year. > >Thoughts? > >Topics list is still somewhat slim... > >1.) status report (mostly OASIS progression, which is expected to be in >OS ballot by then). > >2.) status of joint press release, testimonials -- it's in Janet's and >Carol's hands now. Whether there is anything that we (the WG) need to >do about it in the near future is uncertain. > >3.) another WG F2F? The first question to answer is: what WG work is >there for a F2F? We think that the OASIS TC will probably want to meet >early in the year, and the possibility would exist for a joint meeting. >(Tho' that would probably take a couple years to get mgmt approval, if >it were actually presented as a "joint meeting".) > >4.) work plan for the WG from now till 5/31/07, when Charter expires. >How should WG spend these 5 months? See [13], [13] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/0026.html > >Regards, >-Lofton. > > >At 06:27 PM 12/7/2006 -0700, Lofton Henderson wrote: > > >>WebCGM WG -- >> >>The minutes are at >> >>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2006/12/07-webcgm-minutes >>.html >> >>and also available as text, below. >> >> [1]W3C >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/ >> >> - DRAFT - >> >> WebCGM WG >> >> 7 Dec 2006 >> >> [2]Agenda >> >> [2] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Dec/0001 >> >> See also: [3]IRC log >> >> [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/12/07-webcgm-irc >> >>Attendees >> >> Present >> Lofton, Dave, Stuart >> >> Regrets >> Thierry, Dieter, Benoit >> >> Absent >> Don, Chris >> >> Chair >> Lofton >> >> Scribe >> Dave >> >>Contents >> >> * [4]Topics >> 1. [5]roll call 11:00am ET, membership, agenda >> 2. [6]routine WG business >> 3. [7]report on spec status in OASIS >> 4. [8]report on spec status in W3C >> 5. [9]Press Release and Testimonials >> 6. [10]Future work in WG >> 7. [11]Do we plan to have another F2F? >> * [12]Summary of Action Items >> _________________________________________________________ >> >> >> >> <scribe> Scribe: Dave >> >> <lofton> zakim this is WebCGM >> >>roll call 11:00am ET, membership, agenda >> >>routine WG business >> >> none >> >>report on spec status in OASIS >> >> <lofton> (On roll call -- no quorum) >> >> 2 week OASIS review has started >> >> <lofton> OS ballot starts on Dec 16th >> >>report on spec status in W3C >> >> <lofton> According to Thierry, all was positive. >> >>Press Release and Testimonials >> >> <lofton> It's in the hands of Carol and Janet, and we have no >> further information. >> >>Future work in WG >> >> <lofton> I suggest that we postpone this till we have a quorum, >> except... >> >> see: >> [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/002 >> 6.html >> >> [13] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/0026.htm >> l >> >> <lofton> what do we three think about "supersede"? >> >> <lofton> Agreed: 2.0 does NOT supersede 1.0. Thierry (in email) >> agreed with this. >> >> <lofton> Postpone rest of this topic till later. >> >>Do we plan to have another F2F? >> >> <lofton> What WG work is there that would suggest a F2F? >> >> <lofton> (Need to answer that question first -- email dialog >> needed.) >> >> Ajourned: 11:25 EST >> >>Summary of Action Items >> >> [End of minutes] >> _________________________________________________________ >> >> >> Minutes formatted by David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version 1.127 >> ([15]CVS log) >> $Date: 2006/12/08 01:25:08 $ >> _________________________________________________________ >> >> [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm >> [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ >> >> >> >> > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 17:45:42 UTC