Fwd: SPECMD04

This is a forwarded message
To: "Benoit Bezaire" <benoit@itedo.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 5:12:43 AM
Subject: SPECMD04

===8<==============Original message text===============
Hi Benoit,

explanation to SPECMD04.

The file structure looks like:

Beg Pic
	MSSM abs
Beg Pic Body
	MSSM scaled
	MS 10
	MSSM abs
	MS 1
	MSSM scaled
		Polymarker
	MSSM abs
		Polymarker
	MS 50
	MSSM scaled
		Polymarker
End Pic

The defined scaling factor is 0.1. So the MS 1 becomes 0.1 (this should be
the max. extent of the maker (7.7.7.))
This means that is correct (in my opinion) to draw the marker in the middle
very small and the PNG is wrong.

The only thing that can be discussed is the size of the first or the third
marker: If a size of 10 is set in MSSM scaled, than a size of 1 in MSSM abs,
than switched to MSSM scaled: Did the second value override the first or are
there more than one different marker sizes (one for abs, one for scaled,
etc.)? [...]


===8<===========End of original message text===========

Hi,

We are trying to determine if our rendered result of SPECMD04 is
ok or not. I'm forwarding an explanation that a colleague sent me.
According to this interpretation, rendering a very small marker in the
middle is correct. Your thoughts?

-- 
Regards,
 Benoit                            mailto:benoit@itedo.com