- From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:46:37 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
@emlun suggested "AppID Credential" and "RP ID Credential" terms.... hm... well, I spose I'm thinking that we already have a formal "public key credential" name as well as various informal monikers in use: "webauthn credential", "fido2 credential", "U2F credential"... Since "legacy" is only used, in terms of U2F credentias and JS API, in the two extension definitions (AppId, appidExclude), I'm thinking things are defined clearly enough at this point and we ought not grant legacy U2F creds any further formal status in the context of the webauthn spec. -- GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1244#issuecomment-506537960 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2019 22:46:38 UTC