- From: Patrick Toomey via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 18:47:23 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
> Yes, that is how the spec is written. See https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn/#ref-for-enumdef-attestationconveyancepreference and https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn/#enumdef-attestationconveyancepreference. Gotcha. So, read another way, doesthe existing `AttestationConveyancePreference` roughly accomplish what is being discussed in this thread? If a RP wants to allow syncing, they give a attestation preference of `none` and if they don't, they specify `direct`. It isn't exactly the same thing. But, maybe for all intents and purposes it is unless https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/931 outlines some means of backing up a attestation capable authenticator to another attestation capable authenticator. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ptoomey3 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/969#issuecomment-401135430 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2018 18:47:26 UTC