- From: Emil Lundberg via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:54:00 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
The [packed][packed] format has the same issue with unclear use of `x5c`. If we feel it's worthwhile, we could also touch up the android-key and fido-u2f verification procedures. android-key uses a verbose "the first certificate in `x5c`" wording everywhere, and fido-u2f introduces a new `attCert` name instead of reusing the `attestnCert` name defined in the syntax definition. None of these _necessitate_ a change, though. Should I do that? [packed]: https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#packed-attestation -- GitHub Notification of comment by emlun Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/950#issuecomment-397681310 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 15 June 2018 16:54:03 UTC