Re: [webauthn] Specify extension types in listing instead of prose

In reviewing the rendered diff myself, I realize there are two orthogonal "type" concepts for extensions: the registration/authentication type (which this PR is about) and the client/authenticator type. Perhaps a different term should be used to pre-empt confusion between the two, although it seems they're currently never referred to as "types" in the spec.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by emlun
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/941#issuecomment-395464621 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 7 June 2018 15:32:47 UTC