public-webauthn@w3.org from February 2018 by author

=JeffH

• Re: how to generate diff for webauthn specs? (Monday, 26 February)
• administrivia: Candidate Recommendation and Last Working Draft (Wednesday, 21 February)
• fyi: Intent to Ship: Web Authentication (Wednesday, 7 February)
• fyi: Intent to Implement and ship: aligning U2F attestation with webauthn (Wednesday, 7 February)
• untriaged issues & PRs ? (Friday, 2 February)

=JeffH via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Packed and U2F Attestation Statements' verifications don't differentiate between Basic and Privacy CA Attestation Types (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Examples should include non-ASCII [editorial] (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] note that "credential public key" is the same as "user's public key" (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] ECDAA verification algorithm in TPM Attestation Statement Format (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [webauthn] follow Bluetooth and NFC brand usage guidance (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix #712: Refer to the JSON object as %JSON% (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix feature detection. (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Images not visible in published spec (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Switch |tokenBindingId| to a structure. (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Images not visible in published spec (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Switch |tokenBindingId| to a structure. (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Images not visible in published spec (Monday, 12 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] hardcoded step refs in #registering-a-new-credential are incorrect (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: fix #794: RP registration operation inter-step refs (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: fix #794: RP registration operation inter-step refs (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] hardcoded step refs in #registering-a-new-credential are incorrect (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Consider using "parse JSON from bytes" (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #792: use utf 8 decode directly (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #792: use utf 8 decode directly (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #792: use utf 8 decode directly (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #792: use utf 8 decode directly (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] reference "UTF-8 decode" directly rather than "parse JSON from bytes" (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: fix #792: use utf 8 decode directly (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] reference "UTF-8 decode" directly rather than "parse JSON from bytes" (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Biometric Criteria Extension (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] update masthead and acknowledgements (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] s/CTAP canonical CBOR/CTAP2 canonical CBOR/g (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: CTAP2 definition fix (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: fix #204: factor makeCred into reg & authn priv considerations (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Privacy across Account IDs (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" is ambiguous (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] clarify "authenticator model": RPs may perform feature-based authenticator selection (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] clarify "authenticator model": RPs may perform feature-based authenticator selection (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: fix 645: add discusion of authnr selection to authnr model intro (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] U2F Attestation Statement Format does not define "self attestation" steps (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: fix 745: remove self attstn from U2F attstn format (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: fix 746: uniformly define attestation type short identifiers (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] attestation type identifiers and their use is only implicitly defined (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #204: factor makeCred into reg & authn priv considerations (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: fix 645: add discusion of authnr selection to authnr model intro (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: fix 745: remove self attstn from U2F attstn format (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] attestation type identifiers and their use is only implicitly defined (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: fix 746: uniformly define attestation type short identifiers (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] U2F Attestation Statement Format does not define "self attestation" steps (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Biometric Criteria Extension (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Privacy across Account IDs (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: fix #204: factor makeCred into reg & authn priv considerations (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: fix #658: add user cancelled operation Note (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] CTAP/U2F doesn't status indicating the user cancelled the operation (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Describe how authenticators unique and find credential sources. (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Biometric Criteria Extension (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Describe how authenticators unique and find credential sources. (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Describe how authenticators unique and find credential sources. (Thursday, 1 February)

Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Tuesday, 13 February)

Adam Langley

• Re: 02/14/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 14 February)

Adam Langley via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] Random prefixes to reduce hash requirement of RSA+SHA-1 to TCR (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Random prefixes to reduce hash requirement of RSA+SHA-1 to TCR (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Random prefixes to reduce hash requirement of RSA+SHA-1 to TCR (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Random prefixes to reduce hash requirement of RSA+SHA-1 to TCR (Monday, 26 February)
• [webauthn] Random prefixes to reduce hash requirement of RSA+SHA-1 to TCR (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Why is the Token Binding ID a base64url encoded DOMString rather than an ArrayBuffer? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Why is the Token Binding ID a base64url encoded DOMString rather than an ArrayBuffer? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix feature detection. (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature field clarification in attestation statement (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Switch |tokenBindingId| to a structure. (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Thursday, 15 February)
• [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TokenBindingId value doesn't permit the U2F "unused" value (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Switch |tokenBindingId| to a structure. (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions to PublicKeyCredentialCreateOptions (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] define "blinding" (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Define actions for “none” attestation. (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Update CDDL to reflect packed, self-attestation. (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] hmac-secret extension (Sunday, 4 February)

Adam Powers via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] added reference for TCG-CMCProfile-AIKCertEnroll (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] s/CTAP canonical CBOR/CTAP2 canonical CBOR/g (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: CTAP2 definition fix (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Processing extensions as JSON (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Processing extensions as JSON (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] s/CTAP canonical CBOR/CTAP2 canonical CBOR/g (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions? (Sunday, 4 February)

Akshay Kumar via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Mention FIDO transports extension in X.509 cert requirements? (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Plumb CTAP's authorized "already registered" error through to RP (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Signature field clarification in attestation statement (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Sunday, 18 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature field clarification in attestation statement (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Signature field clarification in attestation statement (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Switch |tokenBindingId| to a structure. (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Justify differences in TPM Attestation Verification procedures in WebAuthn versus TCG specifications (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Tpm attestation fields clarification (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Tpm attestation fields clarification (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] update masthead and acknowledgements (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: update masthead and acknowledgements (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Justify differences in TPM Attestation Verification procedures in WebAuthn versus TCG specifications (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Tpm attestation fields clarification (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Tpm attestation fields clarification (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Justify differences in TPM Attestation Verification procedures in WebAuthn versus TCG specifications (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] update masthead and acknowledgements (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Justify differences in TPM Attestation Verification procedures in WebAuthn versus TCG specifications (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: hmac-secret extension (Sunday, 4 February)
• Re: [webauthn] hmac-secret extension (Sunday, 4 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: hmac-secret extension (Thursday, 1 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by akshayku (Thursday, 1 February)

Alexei Czeskis via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)

Anne van Kesteren via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix #712: Refer to the JSON object as %JSON% (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Consider using "parse JSON from bytes" (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON deserialization is not defined (Thursday, 1 February)

Anthony Nadalin

• 02/28/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 28 February)
• RE: administrivia: Candidate Recommendation and Last Working Draft (Wednesday, 21 February)
• 02/20/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 21 February)
• 02/14/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Milestone reached (Monday, 12 February)
• RE: untriaged issues & PRs ? (Thursday, 8 February)
• 02/07/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Tuesday, 6 February)

Anthony Nadalin via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] Authenticator session not possible for BLE (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Authenticator session not possible for BLE (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Update session management for BT (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Update session management for BT (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Mention FIDO transports extension in X.509 cert requirements? (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Subject-C type in packed cert requirements is incorrect (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revert clientExtensionResults attribute back to getClientExtensionResults function (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix #712: Refer to the JSON object as %JSON% (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Remove clientExtensions and authenticatorExtensions from CollectedClientData (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Plumb CTAP's authorized "already registered" error through to RP (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Switch |tokenBindingId| to a structure. (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nadalin (Friday, 16 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] TokenBindingId value doesn't permit the U2F "unused" value (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] assertionChallenge recommendations (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] adopt consistent terms for RP server-side and client-side components (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Document wide review (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #794: RP registration operation inter-step refs (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #794: RP registration operation inter-step refs (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #792: use utf 8 decode directly (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #792: use utf 8 decode directly (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #792: use utf 8 decode directly (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Biometric Criteria Extension (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Tpm attestation fields clarification (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Tpm attestation fields clarification (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] update masthead and acknowledgements (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" is ambiguous (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #204: factor makeCred into reg & authn priv considerations (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions to PublicKeyCredentialCreateOptions (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix 746: uniformly define attestation type short identifiers (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix 745: remove self attstn from U2F attstn format (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix 645: add discusion of authnr selection to authnr model intro (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix #713: Refer JSON deserialization to Infra spec (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix 745: remove self attstn from U2F attstn format (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Biometric Criteria Extension (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revise §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions? (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Merge {#sample-scenarios} section with the {#usecase} section (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix #668: Recommend RPs to verify UP and UV flags (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Update session management for BT (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Define actions for “none” attestation. (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix outdated step references in RP registration algorithm (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Update CDDL to reflect packed, self-attestation. (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Editorial changes from PR #718 (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #658: add user cancelled operation Note (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] PR #763 untangled: Add consideration of browser permissions framework for extension processing (Monday, 5 February)

Arnar Birgisson via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Why is the Token Binding ID a base64url encoded DOMString rather than an ArrayBuffer? (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Why is the Token Binding ID a base64url encoded DOMString rather than an ArrayBuffer? (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)

cpiper via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)

Domenic Denicola via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Fix #712: Refer to the JSON object as %JSON% (Thursday, 22 February)

Emil Lundberg via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Add non-ASCII RP display name example (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add non-ASCII RP display name example (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add non-ASCII RP display name example (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Display name content rules? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Random prefixes to reduce hash requirement of RSA+SHA-1 to TCR (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Saturday, 24 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Mention FIDO transports extension in X.509 cert requirements? (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Mention FIDO transports extension in X.509 cert requirements? (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change Subject-C type from UTF8String to PrintableString (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change Subject-C type from UTF8String to PrintableString (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Change Subject-C type from UTF8String to PrintableString (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Mention FIDO transports extension in X.509 cert requirements? (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Subject-C type in packed cert requirements is incorrect (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Subject-C type in packed cert requirements is incorrect (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] Subject-C type in packed cert requirements is incorrect (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] Mention FIDO transports extension in X.509 cert requirements? (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revert clientExtensionResults attribute back to getClientExtensionResults function (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix #712: Refer to the JSON object as %JSON% (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix #712: Refer to the JSON object as %JSON% (Thursday, 22 February)
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Fix #712: Refer to the JSON object as %JSON% (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix #712: Refer to the JSON object as %JSON% (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Spelling and grammar corrections (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Plumb CTAP's authorized "already registered" error through to RP (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Plumb CTAP's authorized "already registered" error through to RP (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Plumb CTAP's authorized "already registered" error through to RP (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix #712: Refer to the JSON object as %JSON% (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Remove clientExtensions and authenticatorExtensions from CollectedClientData (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Remove clientExtensions and authenticatorExtensions from CollectedClientData (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Create an Explainer document (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] providing info about authenticator availability / attachments (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Plumb CTAP's authorized "already registered" error through to RP (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] Clarify how RP should verify extension outputs (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Consider using "parse JSON from bytes" (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TokenBindingId value doesn't permit the U2F "unused" value (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [webauthn] Ensure hard-coded step references in RP ops are correct (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] Ensure hard-coded step references in RP ops are correct (Monday, 12 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Recommend RPs to verify UP and UV flags (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix #668: Recommend RPs to verify UP and UV flags (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] fix #792: use utf 8 decode directly (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] reference "UTF-8 decode" directly rather than "parse JSON from bytes" (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix #668: Recommend RPs to verify UP and UV flags (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] update masthead and acknowledgements (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] JSON deserialization is not defined (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix #713: Refer JSON deserialization to Infra spec (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions to PublicKeyCredentialCreateOptions (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix #713: Refer JSON deserialization to Infra spec (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions to PublicKeyCredentialCreateOptions (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Align wording between first and second paragraphs in section 9.5 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revise §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Align wording between first and second paragraphs in section 9.5 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] U2F Attestation Statement Format does not define "self attestation" steps (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" is ambiguous (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Revise §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" is ambiguous (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix outdated step references in RP registration algorithm (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Editorial changes from PR #718 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix #668: Recommend RPs to verify UP and UV flags (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions? (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Biometric Criteria Extension (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] providing info about authenticator availability / attachments (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] providing info about authenticator availability / attachments (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Biometric Criteria Extension (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON deserialization is not defined (Monday, 5 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix outdated step references in RP registration algorithm (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] PR #763 untangled: Add consideration of browser permissions framework for extension processing (Monday, 5 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix outdated step references in RP registration algorithm (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [webauthn] PR #763 untangled: Add consideration of browser permissions framework for extension processing (Friday, 2 February)

GitHub

• [w3c/webauthn] 13b5b3: Built by Travis-CI: 716a169d4f68508dfe28216789bf82... (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 716a16: Updates for draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-01 (#... (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 1940d0: Built by Travis-CI: 567ae6de6f9e0632ffddb602904c15... (Friday, 23 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 567ae6: Change Subject-C type from UTF8String to Printable... (Friday, 23 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] e24987: Built by Travis-CI: c18a1387026b51b3d33d19a12d49cd... (Friday, 23 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] c18a13: Revert clientExtensionResults attribute back to ge... (Friday, 23 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 4e77cf: Built by Travis-CI: 5c3054f1f0e2a3eeb8a4f24b39032a... (Friday, 23 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 5c3054: Spelling and grammar corrections (#815) (Friday, 23 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 075329: Built by Travis-CI: c4a30ee7ea99de0cdfc38ceecac564... (Thursday, 22 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] c4a30e: Change uses of acme.com to example.com (#814) (Thursday, 22 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 6dea56: Built by Travis-CI: 3ceed42963c22af0c3f0df1ecbae28... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 3ceed4: Change from getClientExtensionResults function to ... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 195a8f: Plumb CTAP's authorized "already registered" error... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 087d37: Built by Travis-CI: bbfd0777362b39f042ea061355cbaa... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] bbfd07: Remove clientExtensions and authenticatorExtension... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 409f34: Built by Travis-CI: 39bc6cf1c21a8a1731334666ae77a5... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 39bc6c: Make IANA COSE Algorithms values TBD with requeste... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] adbda3: Fix feature detection. (#808) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 6f3dbc: Built by Travis-CI: 3a3700a68a73bdab35679cb8a83fc4... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 3a3700: Signature field clarification in attestation state... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] c8c43e: Incorporating comments - 6 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 4bdb54: Json comma issue (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] a47fe1: Switch |tokenBindingId| to a structure. (Sunday, 18 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 4514d1: Incorporating comments-4 (Saturday, 17 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 18f342: Incorporating comments-3 (Friday, 16 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 02f96c: Incorporating comments (Friday, 16 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 0ab294: Built by Travis-CI: 05335d4484044dbca552f74ab52ff1... (Friday, 16 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] a47fe1: Switch |tokenBindingId| to a structure. (Friday, 16 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 861667: typo (Friday, 16 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 61bc86: Put Signature formats in its own section (Friday, 16 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] f13bbc: Exception for ECDSA for consistency (Friday, 16 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] ec4921: Clarify that ECDSA is ASN.1 DER format (Friday, 16 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 7b518b: Sig Clarification (Friday, 16 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 15fc95: Built by Travis-CI: e3c1ad491caa682e76ae682b633629... (Monday, 12 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Monday, 12 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] e3c1ad: fix RP reg op inter-step refs (#795) (Monday, 12 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 7f4248: Built by Travis-CI: 4dbc3af9d0aebad6bf87448a15574c... (Monday, 12 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 4dbc3a: Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to... (Monday, 12 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 4af3d8: fix RP reg op inter-step refs (Monday, 12 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 5c0aa5: Built by Travis-CI: 57ab456f93afbd13ac1cd179996760... (Saturday, 10 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 57ab45: fix #792: use utf 8 decode directly (#793) (Saturday, 10 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] cac111: Un-hardcode step numbers in RP operations (Saturday, 10 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] b46560: Built by Travis-CI: 2bc4c05c517ef3491d387c2c59e880... (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] cac111: Un-hardcode step numbers in RP operations (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 92b51d: apply same changes to #verifying-assertion (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 3c435a: fixup inter-step references, thx emlun! (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] af8b20: add JSON explicit parsing step (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 191fa8: use UTF-8 decode alg directly (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 22b884: Built by Travis-CI: d563d8352590322b404ef76e53a4f1... (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 7b8476: Update index.bs (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 925403: Built by Travis-CI: f41cf83849f1725d545e14f1bb84f5... (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] f41cf8: Tpm attestation fields clarification (#791) (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 1f51af: NitBit: Incorporate comments from Alex, Mike (Friday, 9 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] d1e2d1: added reference for TPMS_CERTIFY_INFO (Thursday, 8 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 08a981: Built by Travis-CI: 1dc69b110f0851acebc16c5c3bf4f5... (Thursday, 8 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 1dc69b: update masthead and acks (#788) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] cb2fa0: Built by Travis-CI: a92321efe4dea6077137295ea7d05b... (Thursday, 8 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 8 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] a92321: renamed authenticator-model to sctn-authenticator-... (Thursday, 8 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] cdf234: added reference to the Standard Attestation Struct... (Thursday, 8 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 45caac: Tpm attestation fields clarifications (Thursday, 8 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] bfbc8a: renamed authenticator-model to sctn-authenticator-... (Thursday, 8 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 81ad4c: update masthead and acks (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 01eb5e: Built by Travis-CI: ca4cf0f63d2f7f5fd48cddc31b1cb3... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 42cc9d: Revise §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" ... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] ca4cf0: Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions to PublicKey... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 563379: CTAP2 definition fix (#783) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 1d7b02: fix #204: factor makeCred into reg & authn priv co... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 24a567: add discusion of authnr selection to authnr model ... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 3e99d4: Built by Travis-CI: 24a567b36f5b9d0223067dc0714649... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] c38507: added reference for TCG-CMCProfile-AIKCertEnroll (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 7e5c33: Built by Travis-CI: 4d700225b49d4ae0869509c1ff063f... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 6eddb4: Refer JSON deserialization to Infra spec (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] d56d1e: fix 746: uniformly define attestation type short i... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 1d89ff: Built by Travis-CI: 7fa8792b7be410c4ddb632056a2335... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] c45630: Update index.bs (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 7fa879: rmove self attstn from U2F attstn format (#781) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] db4ed3: Built by Travis-CI: d56d1e76b9e27b182c7dc1909d4eb8... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 381bbf: refer to ceremony rather than operation (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] fea840: add discusion of authnr selection to authnr model ... (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] d6b988: Built by Travis-CI: 5124c6106cad3798d28b0fde634ce4... (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] c45630: Update index.bs (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 934084: rmove self attstn from U2F attstn format (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] a9f806: create short names for attstn types not having suc... (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 894c2f: Align wording between first and second paragraphs ... (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 894c2f: Align wording between first and second paragraphs ... (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 7c0950: Attempt to address @selfissued's review comments (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 931b60: Revert "Move <dfn>authenticator extension input</d... (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 8045f4: Built by Travis-CI: f13e030eaccfff478d17548d3f3f62... (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] b77a5e: factor makeCred into reg & authn priv cons (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] f13e03: fix #658: add user cancelled operation Note (#760) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 7415c4: Clarify that |extensions| in authenticator ops is ... (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] b84a10: Fix outdated step references in RP registration al... (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] b84a10: Fix outdated step references in RP registration al... (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] e192c3: Un-hardcode step numbers in RP operations (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] d77acb: Update index.bs (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 99766e: PR #763 untangled: Add consideration of browser p... (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 35032b: Define actions for “none” attestation. (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] f0224a: Update CDDL to reflect packed, self-attestation. (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 4f1a3b: Describe how authenticators unique and find creden... (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 696cc5: Corrected txAuthGeneric client extension input typ... (Monday, 5 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] f0ad6c: Address review comments by @equalsJeffH (Monday, 5 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Friday, 2 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 60ed25: hmac-secret extension (Thursday, 1 February)

gmandyam via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify byte size requirements for UVI (Tuesday, 27 February)
• [webauthn] Clarify byte size requirements for UVI (Monday, 26 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: UVI modification with CDDL (Monday, 26 February)
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Location extension corrections (Thursday, 15 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Revert location extension back to approved PR's (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revert location extension back to approved PR's (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revert location extension back to approved PR's (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revert location extension back to approved PR's (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revert location extension back to approved PR's (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Location extension corrections (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [webauthn] Revert location extension back to approved PR's (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Biometric Criteria Extension (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by gmandyam (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Biometric Criteria Extension (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Justify differences in TPM Attestation Verification procedures in WebAuthn versus TCG specifications (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revise §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by gmandyam (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [webauthn] PR #763 untangled: Add consideration of browser permissions framework for extension processing (Friday, 2 February)

Hodges, Jeff

• Re: 02/14/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 14 February)

Ibrahim Damlaj via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Saturday, 17 February)

J.C. Jones

• FYI - TravisCI keeps getting disabled (Tuesday, 6 February)

J.C. Jones via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Display name content rules? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Packed and U2F Attestation Statements' verifications don't differentiate between Basic and Privacy CA Attestation Types (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Packed and U2F Attestation Statements' verifications don't differentiate between Basic and Privacy CA Attestation Types (Wednesday, 28 February)

J. S. Choi via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Saturday, 24 February)

Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Friday, 16 February)

Jim Schaad via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)

Johan Verrept via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] update masthead and acknowledgements (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Update session management for BT (Wednesday, 7 February)

John Fontana

• Re: administrivia: Candidate Recommendation and Last Working Draft (Wednesday, 21 February)

Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify byte size requirements for UVI (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify byte size requirements for UVI (Tuesday, 27 February)

kpaulh via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Why is the Token Binding ID a base64url encoded DOMString rather than an ArrayBuffer? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TokenBindingId value doesn't permit the U2F "unused" value (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TokenBindingId value doesn't permit the U2F "unused" value (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [webauthn] TokenBindingId value doesn't permit the U2F "unused" value (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] TokenBindingId value doesn't permit the U2F "unsued" (Monday, 12 February)

Mike Jones

• FW: New Version Notification for draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-01.txt (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Regrets for 02/14/2018 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting (Wednesday, 14 February)

Mike Jones via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Add non-ASCII RP display name example (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Updates for draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-01 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add CDDL to every extension (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Add CDDL to every extension (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Packed and U2F Attestation Statements' verifications don't differentiate between Basic and Privacy CA Attestation Types (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Transaction authorization extensions are registration and authentication extension? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Display name content rules? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] RP guidelines should allow RP to not check attestation (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Include Constants for COSE Algorithm Numbers (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Include Constants for COSE Algorithm Numbers (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] document why only "valid domain" format is allowed for "effective domain" (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Replace Authenticator Model with CTAP (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Replace Authenticator Model with CTAP (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Updates for draft-hodges-webauthn-registries-01 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Random prefixes to reduce hash requirement of RSA+SHA-1 to TCR (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Saturday, 24 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Change Subject-C type from UTF8String to PrintableString (Friday, 23 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Subject-C type in packed cert requirements is incorrect (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Revert clientExtensionResults attribute back to getClientExtensionResults function (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revert clientExtensionResults attribute back to getClientExtensionResults function (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Mention FIDO transports extension in X.509 cert requirements? (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Subject-C type in packed cert requirements is incorrect (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Revert clientExtensionResults attribute back to getClientExtensionResults function (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Spelling and grammar corrections (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Thursday, 22 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Spelling and grammar corrections (Thursday, 22 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Change uses of acme.com to example.com (Thursday, 22 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Thursday, 22 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Change uses of acme.com to example.com (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] RPs cannot show "You've Already Registered This Authenticator" Message (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Plumb CTAP's authorized "already registered" error through to RP (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Remove clientExtensions and authenticatorExtensions from CollectedClientData (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Clarify how RP should verify extension outputs (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Why is the Token Binding ID a base64url encoded DOMString rather than an ArrayBuffer? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Why is the Token Binding ID a base64url encoded DOMString rather than an ArrayBuffer? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Make IANA COSE Algorithms values TBD with requested assignments (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix feature detection. (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON-serialized client data is wrong (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Remove clientExtensions and authenticatorExtensions from CollectedClientData (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Plumb CTAP's authorized "already registered" error through to RP (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Make IANA COSE Algorithms values TBD with requested assignments (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Remove clientExtensions and authenticatorExtensions from CollectedClientData (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature field clarification in attestation statement (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Why is the Token Binding ID a base64url encoded DOMString rather than an ArrayBuffer? (Saturday, 17 February)
• [webauthn] Why is the Token Binding ID a base64url encoded DOMString rather than an ArrayBuffer? (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Signature format needs to be defined (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revert location extension back to approved PR's (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] agl doesn't understand extensions (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revert location extension back to approved PR's (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revert location extension back to approved PR's (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revert location extension back to approved PR's (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Monday, 12 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] UAs can't pass unknown extensions to authenticators (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Saturday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] reference "UTF-8 decode" directly rather than "parse JSON from bytes" (Saturday, 10 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: fix #792: use utf 8 decode directly (Saturday, 10 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Justify differences in TPM Attestation Verification procedures in WebAuthn versus TCG specifications (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add instructions for passing unknown extensions to authenticators (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions to PublicKeyCredentialCreateOptions (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions? (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" is ambiguous (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Revise §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revise §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] update extensions framework to include interfacing with user agent permissions framework (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions to PublicKeyCredentialCreateOptions (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions to PublicKeyCredentialCreateOptions (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Processing extensions as JSON (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] JSON deserialization is not defined (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] update extensions framework to include interfacing with user agent permissions framework (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions to PublicKeyCredentialCreateOptions (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] §9.5. "Authenticator extension processing" is ambiguous (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding CDDL to txAuthSimple (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions? (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Rename MakePublicKeyCredentialOptions? (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Fix #668: Recommend RPs to verify UP and UV flags (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [webauthn] s/CTAP canonical CBOR/CTAP2 canonical CBOR/g (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: PR #763 untangled: Add consideration of browser permissions framework for extension processing (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued (Tuesday, 6 February)

Mike West via GitHub

• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix feature detection. (Monday, 19 February)

Owen Campbell-Moore via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Create an Explainer document (Tuesday, 20 February)

Peter Saint-Andre via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Display name content rules? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Add non-ASCII RP display name example (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Monday, 26 February)

Rolf Lindemann

• AW: [webauthn] Update session management for BT (Wednesday, 7 February)

Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] Images not visible in published spec (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Images not visible in published spec (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Images not visible in published spec (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: renamed authenticator-model to sctn-authenticator-model (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Tpm attestation fields clarification (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: renamed authenticator-model to sctn-authenticator-model (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: added reference for TCG-CMCProfile-AIKCertEnroll (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] added reference for TCG-CMCProfile-AIKCertEnroll (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] reference TCG-CMCProfile-AIKCertEnroll missing. (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] reference TCG-CMCProfile-AIKCertEnroll missing. (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] reference TCG-CMCProfile-AIKCertEnroll missing. (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] added reference for TCG-CMCProfile-AIKCertEnroll (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: added reference for TCG-CMCProfile-AIKCertEnroll (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [webauthn] reference TCG-CMCProfile-AIKCertEnroll missing. (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] reference TCG-CMCProfile-AIKCertEnroll missing. (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] Images not visible in published spec (Wednesday, 7 February)

Tim Taubert via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Change from getClientExtensionResults function to clientExtensionResults attribute (Thursday, 22 February)

WebAuthnBot via GitHub

• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Friday, 23 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Thursday, 22 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Saturday, 10 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Friday, 9 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot (Tuesday, 6 February)

Wendy Seltzer via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] follow Bluetooth and NFC brand usage guidance (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Images not visible in published spec (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Images not visible in published spec (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Images not visible in published spec (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] follow Bluetooth and NFC brand usage guidance (Wednesday, 14 February)

xialvjun via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Sunday, 25 February)
• [webauthn] What's this SPEC for? (Saturday, 24 February)

Zibi Braniecki via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Display name content rules? (Wednesday, 28 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2018 22:59:41 UTC