- From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 03:32:11 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
@rlin wrote in https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/498#issuecomment-330918874 > The comment [#issuecomment-319595322](https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/498#issuecomment-319595322) relates to issue #290 in FIDO CTAP (that one present an alternative approach). two things: 1. #issuecomment-319595322](https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/498#issuecomment-319595322) does not seem to relate to the thrust/theme of this PR #498. if i understand correctly, it is requesting a feature down at the authenticator API level. Perhaps it should be submitted as a separate issue -- on CTAP? on the webauthn "aiuthenticator model" ? both? 2. I do not understand the "relates to issue #290 in FIDO CTAP (that one present an alternative approach)." both webauthn issue #290 and [CTAP issue #290](https://github.com/fido-alliance/fido-2-specs/issues/290) seem unrelated. -- GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/498#issuecomment-332398969 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2017 03:32:02 UTC