Re: [webauthn] Sign counter alg 507

@jehrensvard are you saying that the current validation rule of ignoring the counter if the current value is 0 and the previous value is unset or 0 is fine?   That then leaves the full 32bit unsigned in to be used as a time value or other non by 1 incrementing system,  rather than treating all values with the high bit set as special as you previously speculated.  

If so I think we are done.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by ve7jtb
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/539#issuecomment-328239977 using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 9 September 2017 00:04:22 UTC