- From: Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:16:26 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
I like it. This would make the doc easier to skim for an implementer or developer. It would also allow us to simplify some of the processing rules by representing them in syntax - for example instead of saying that the RP should reject an attestation when it has both x5c and daaKey, we could just put it down as a choice in CDDL. I'll take a stab at this in the next couple of days if nobody has an objection. -- GitHub Notification of comment by vijaybh Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/318#issuecomment-274281929 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 21 January 2017 19:16:33 UTC