- From: Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:38:43 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Right, this was the intention. @jyasskin, the distinction you mention is what #378 was trying to capture - that PR is providing a way for an RP to telegraph that they will be calling getAssertion with an empty allowList, so the client should only create a credential that would be usable in this way. -- GitHub Notification of comment by vijaybh Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/387#issuecomment-294176048 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 14 April 2017 15:38:49 UTC