- From: Mike Jones via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 23:29:48 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
I agree that we should keep the term "WebAuthn Relying Party", at least when the term is first introduced. It would be fine at that point to also say that, in this specification, this is sometimes shortened to just "Relying Party" or "RP". -- GitHub Notification of comment by selfissued Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/180#issuecomment-291670478 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2017 23:29:54 UTC