- From: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:18:57 +0000
- To: "Axel.Nennker@telekom.de" <Axel.Nennker@telekom.de>, "public-webauthn@w3.org" <public-webauthn@w3.org>
Thanks for pointing this out. It seems pretty harmless to rename the object or to scope it better. Would you please open an issue? -----Original Message----- From: Axel.Nennker@telekom.de [mailto:Axel.Nennker@telekom.de] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 2:03 AM To: public-webauthn@w3.org Subject: Transport in U2F and WebAuthn WebIDL Hi, while pushing webauthn webidl through Mozilla's build systems I noticed that "Transport" is defined in both U2F.webidl and in WebAuthn. I think we should not put something this general as "Transport" in the global namespace. Or can this be put in a namespace local to WebAuthn? AuthenticatorTransport? Cheers Axel
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2016 17:19:48 UTC