- From: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:06:05 +0000
- To: Rolf Lindemann <rlindemann@noknok.com>, "public-webauthn@w3.org" <public-webauthn@w3.org>
Suggested wording? I did add the sentence in Section 7 encouraging implementation of the pre-defined extensions. Does that work for you? -----Original Message----- From: Rolf Lindemann [mailto:rlindemann@noknok.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 9:59 AM To: 'Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub' <sysbot+gh@w3.org>; public-webauthn@w3.org Subject: AW: [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh I would prefer more encouragement to Client implementers for passing-through extensions - at least the ones defined in the webauthn spec. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub [mailto:sysbot+gh@w3.org] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2016 18:08 An: public-webauthn@w3.org Betreff: [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh The following commits were just pushed by vijaybh to https://github.com/w3c/webauthn: * Wordsmithing prose around client pass-through of extensions by Vijay Bharadwaj https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/commit/69b8763f10fc5af051165dc7bfdeff4bd0409d9d
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 17:06:46 UTC