- From: Mike Jones via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:07:52 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
There's a reason that the contributed FIDO specs contained descriptions of the attestation formats that they did - because they're practically needed by implementers for things to work end-to-end. For instance, I know that when I tried to read the actual TPM specs they were essentially incomprehensible. We need to keep our summary of it to help developers using WebCrypto. Likewise, the Android assertions will be commonly used, so it's a help to developers to keep a description of them. We should take deleting this useful text off of the table. Yes, we could move these descriptions into a different spec, but that only would make it harder for developers to understand end-to-end what they need to know to build systems using WebAuthN. Therefore, I believe that we should leave things as they are. -- GitHub Notification of comment by selfissued Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/108#issuecomment-235977239 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2016 18:08:00 UTC