Re: editorial: webarch fragments weren't preserved across drafts

On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 15:04, Dan Connolly wrote:
> I used
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#implied-dereference
> in a discussion and it didn't survive the recent update.
> 
> Last version:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PR-webarch-20041105/#pr-implied-dereference
> 
> Previous Version:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-webarch-20040816/#implied-dereference
> 
> Please arrange for #implied-dereference to resolve to
> something relevant.

Hi DanC,

This seems to be because the thing referred to was promoted
to a principle. When I first started editing this thing,
I prefixed all of the principles with "pr-". Apparently when
the item was promoted, the "pr-" was added to the existing
anchor. 

It seems reasonable to add another anchor there with
name="implied-dereference".

I used the "pr-" convention to avoid anchor name clashes
but now it seems like that was unnecessary and perhaps
silly.

 _ Ian


-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447