[closed]: too positive on extensibility [was: random comments on 2nd LC of WebArch]

On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 10:10, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote:
> Le mar 05/10/2004 à 15:14, Chris Lilley a écrit :
> > please see the new introductory text at
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/webarch-20040928/Overview.html#ext-version
> >
> > Later on we more clearly differentiate between extensibility and
> > versioning, as agreed at the TAG/QA joint telcon.
> > 
> > We believe this addresses your concern; do you agree?
> 
> The QA WG discussed this during its F2F meeting today and agreed this
> addresses our concerns. Sorry for the delay in our answer.

Actually, this is still quite timely. Thanks.

I presume I can close the more official QA WG thread too...
http://www.w3.org/mid/1095351501.2955.11.camel@stratustier

> 
> Dom
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E