Le lun 18/10/2004 à 22:55, Chris Lilley a écrit : > >> Le mar 05/10/2004 à 16:25:36 +0200, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit : > >> >> I'll pass it to the QA WG; I expect that you should hear a reply from > >> >> us by Monday EOB. Thanks, > >> > >> Any update on that? Sorry about the delay; the QA WG hasn't found the cycles yet to process your proposed answer; there was one comment that the title of the new good practice ("Extensibility conformance") doesn't make sense (I guess "Extensibility and conformance" is what was intended). The QA WG is meeting F2F at the end of next week; if you can wait till then to get the WG official answer, I'll make sure we address this early on our agenda; if not, I guess you can take our silence as approbation. Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 12:48:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:37:33 GMT