W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webarch-comments@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: WebArch comment from QA WG

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:58:30 +0100
Message-ID: <8D5B24B83C6A2E4B9E7EE5FA82627DC9688D@sdcexcea01.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
Cc: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>, <tag@w3.org>, "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, <public-webarch-comments@w3.org>

Lofton, Karl, 

Thanks for responding... 

The TAG have a F2F meeting scheduled for 5-7th October in Europe. I
expect this to focus on the LC comments we receive on our LC#2 draft of
webarch. If you are able to send comments by the end of our last call
(17th September IIRC) we could  maybe schedule a meeting between then
and our F2F - say Monday 20th or 27th Sept. Would either of those dates
work for QA-WG?

Best regards


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-webarch-comments-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-webarch-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> Lofton Henderson
> Sent: 25 August 2004 14:44
> To: Williams, Stuart
> Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org; tag@w3.org; David Orchard; 
> public-webarch-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: WebArch comment from QA WG
> Stuart,
> Thanks for the reply and the suggestion to confer.
> Two quick comments:
> 1.) IMO, the suggested conference is a good idea (however, as 
> I'm no longer QA co-chair, Karl is probably the one to schedule this);
> 2.) right now, we're in the middle of publication (8/30) for Spec. 
> Guidelines (which contains our extensibility stuff) and QA 
> Handbook, and we also have an action to generate WebArch Last 
> Call comments in a couple weeks.  To me, it would seem timely 
> to talk after we have finished both of these, as they will 
> likely have led us (QAWG) to a close comparison of new SpecGL 
> stuff and LC WebArch.
> Regards,
> -Lofton.
Received on Friday, 3 September 2004 12:59:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:26:47 UTC