- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:38:20 -0500
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webarch-comments@w3.org
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 08:46, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > A few points I noted while skimming through > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-webarch-20040816/ and your 3rd point seems to be... > Data formats > - in 4.2.3 "Experience suggests that the long term benefits of > extensibility generally outweigh the costs" is probably too positive > without consideration for a trade-off; while I think this will be one of > the topics on which the QA WG will comment, I suggest that some > qualification along "benefits of a well-defined extensibility > mechanism..." instead > > - in 4.2.4, "Each application must define how namespaces interact and > what effect the namespace of an element has on the element's ancestors"; > is this application-dependent, or language-dependent? I believe the > latter, at least in most cases > > Also, maybe having a good practice associated to this section would be > of interest; although the TAG has still open issues on the topic, I > think a well-crafted Good practice for XML languages is achievable. Please stand by for a reply in substance. I hope it won't take more than a few weeks. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 21:38:10 UTC