W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webarch-comments@w3.org > December 2003

Re: Strange abbreviation in References

From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 04:55:44 -0500
To: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
Cc: public-webarch-comments@w3.org, dom@w3.org
Message-Id: <1071222944.1945.19.camel@seabright>
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 04:44, Masayasu Ishikawa wrote:
> Picking a few more minor nits in References:
> 
> The IRI reference says [3]:
> 
>   IRI
>     IETF Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs), M. Duerst,
>     M. Suignard, Nov 2002. This IETF Internet Draft is available at
>     http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/draft-duerst-iri.html.
>     If this document is no longer available, refer to the home page
>     for Editing 'Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs)'.
> 
> It is indeed spelled "Duerst" in that Internet Draft, but in "Authors'
> Addresses" section the author noted as follows [4]:
> 
>    (Note: Please write "Duerst" with u-umlaut wherever possible, for
>     example as "D&#252;rst in XML and HTML.)
> 
> I'd suggest to respect his wish.

Yep.


> The P3P10 reference [5] says "M. Marchiori, Editors", but there seems
> to be only one editor.

Dom, that improper plural also seems to be coming from the extractor.

> There are references to IETF RFCs, but some of them refer to www.ietf.org
> and others refer to www.rfc-editor.org .  The latter seems authoritative,
> but in any case, I'd suggest to refer to RFCs consistently.

I hadn't realized that one domain was more authoritative than
the other. I prefer ietf.org since it's shorter. I'll make them
consistent with that unless I hear strong opinions that we
should use the other one.

Thanks again,

 _ Ian

> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/#IRI
> [4] http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/draft-duerst-iri.html#rfc.authors
> [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/#P3P10
> 
> Regards,
-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Received on Friday, 12 December 2003 04:55:45 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Friday, 12 December 2003 04:55:46 EST