Re: Call for Consensus: SRI to Proposed Recommendation

Huzzah! Thanks, Brad.

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016, 6:33 PM Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote:

> I sent the transition-to-PR for SRI on January 22nd.  It's part of a suite
> of transitions I need to check in on with Wendy that have been stalled.
>
> -Brad
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:24 AM Joel Weinberger <jww@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> No, based on a conversation I had with Wendy, I believe we need one of
>> the chairs (Brad or Dan) to file a Transition Request to move to PR.
>> --Joel
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:07 PM Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have been asked when SRI is advancing to PR.
>>> With this CfC having ended months ago, am I right to assume that I can
>>> make the change?
>>>
>>> On 05.01.2016 18:54, Brad Hill wrote:
>>> > Subresource Integrity has passed its deadline for comments to the
>>> > Candidate Recommendation.  While new features have been proposed for
>>> > future conformance levels, no substantive issues or changes have been
>>> > identified for the Level 1 specification.
>>> >
>>> > This is a call for consensus to record the group's decision to request
>>> > advancement to Proposed Recommendation Status, with a proposed end of
>>> AC
>>> > review date of February 17.  This call for consensus will end following
>>> > our next regular teleconference on January 13.
>>> >
>>> > Affirmative responses are encouraged, silence is consent.
>>> >
>>> > Sincerely,
>>> >
>>> > Brad Hill as Co-Chair, WebAppSec WG
>>>
>>>
>>>