On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Joel Weinberger <jww@chromium.org> > wrote: > >> While I like the maintainability of this proposal, it seems like it might >> complicated the versioning that Dev has proposed in the past (that I really >> like). Namely, for each sub-spec, you'd have to tie it into a specific CSP >> version you'd like it to be in, and tracking all of that information down >> across specs might be difficult. But if we want versioning, maybe it's >> still worth figuring out how to do it well across distributed chunks like >> this. >> > > I see Mike's proposal as a way towards avoiding versioning. I think it is > worth trying to avoid versioning. It's not clear what issues that people > are proposing to solve with versioning, though. > Yup. This is what I'm going for. I don't want to tie subspecs to a version of CSP. Features are features, and there's no reason they need to be implemented in a block. I'm equally curious about what issues versioning would solve that makes it appealing to folks like Dev (who I'm CCing directly :) ). -mike
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2015 10:56:40 UTC