Re: [SRI] Comments on Subresource Integrity spec

I thought the MAY gave flexibility to UAs. Does it not?
On May 18, 2015 6:16 AM, "Gervase Markham" <gerv@mozilla.org> wrote:

On 17/05/15 08:51, Devdatta Akhawe wrote:
> "User agents MAY deprecate support (by blocking loads) for integrity
> validation using hash functions deemed insecure. Web application authors
> SHOULD update integrity metadata to remove use of insecure hash
functions."

No problem with the second sentence. The first seems fairly specific; I
thought you were arguing for flexibility in how UAs handle "deprecation"?

Gerv

Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 15:34:03 UTC