Re: Follow-up to TAG meeting on Powerful Features

Hi Wendy -

As captured in our raw minutes (http://www.w3.org/2015/02/12-tagmem-minutes.html <http://www.w3.org/2015/02/12-tagmem-minutes.html>) I believe Yan stepped forward to play that role. I think it’s up to the WebAppSec group chairs to determine whether that should be a co-editorship. My suggestion was to use the packaging spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/web-packaging/ <http://www.w3.org/TR/web-packaging/>) as a template for what a joint deliverable could look like (check out the Status section of that document).

Dan

> On 16 Feb 2015, at 10:07, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dan and TAG, cc WebAppSec,
> 
> Thanks for inviting discussion on "Requirements for Powerful Features"
> at the recent TAG meeting.
> 
> As a proposed way forward, I heard TAG express interest in working with
> WebAppSec on the specification, to edit a joint product in which the
> requirements for "Is [insert feature here] powerful?" could be
> normative. That way, we'd combine the TAG's insight on architectural
> considerations with WebAppSec's security expertise.
> 
> If that's a correct recollection, who from the TAG would be interested
> in working with WebAppSec, and how can I help to bring you on-board?
> 
> Best,
> --Wendy
> 
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office)
> Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
> http://wendy.seltzer.org/        +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
>