Re: Asynchronous decision making (Re: WebAppSec re-charter status)

I can't speak for Mozilla as a whole, but it seems to support the idea
behind the original comment.

 +1! :)



On 05.02.2015 00:38, Brad Hill wrote:
> Wendy, I like that language, if it is acceptable to Mozilla and others.
> 
> On Wed Feb 04 2015 at 3:17:23 PM Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org
> <mailto:wseltzer@w3.org>> wrote:
> 
>     On 02/04/2015 03:40 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>     > On 2/4/15 1:49 PM, Mike West wrote:
>     >> CCing Arthur, who I hope can talk a bit about WebApps process, since
>     >> it seems like a good thing to get on the same page as that group.
>     >
>     > WebApps does not have regular calls and when we do have a
>     spec-specific
>     > call (which are relatively rare), those calls are not used to
>     > bind/confirm decisions.
>     >
>     > (FWIW, I agree WebApps' 10 day waiting period (as defined in the
>     > charter) is relatively long and that changing it to 7 days would be
>     > consistent with the length of our binding CfC periods.)
> 
>     I wonder, could we address reviewers' concerns without lengthening our
>     process by modifying that text slightly:
> 
>     "Any resolution *first* taken in a face-to-face meeting or
>     teleconference [i.e., that does not follow a call for consensus on the
>     mailing list] is to be considered provisional until *5* working days
>     after the publication of the resolution in draft minutes sent to the
>     Working Group's mailing list. If no objections are raised on the mailing
>     list within that time, the resolution will be considered to have
>     consensus as a resolution of the Working Group."
> 
> 
>     --Wendy
> 
>     --
>     Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org <mailto:wseltzer@w3.org>
>     +1.617.715.4883 (office)
>     Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
>     http://wendy.seltzer.org/        +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 11:03:58 UTC