Re: CfC: Subresource Integrity (SRI) to Last Call? from Austin William Wright on 2015-04-23 (public-webappsec@w3.org from April 2015)

From: Austin William Wright <aaa@bzfx.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:45:27 -0700
To: Joel Weinberger <jww@chromium.org>
Cc: Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CANkuk-XuLpPZ9Uxg51stvVycsvm0YZtUWryu3P5OjDHV1wVkcQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Joel Weinberger <jww@chromium.org> wrote:

> I'm not particular tied to any syntax. I have never viewed the 'integrity'
> attribute as a resource identifier (to the contrary, in the cases we're
> dealing with, there is a separate resource identifier), so the ni:/// never
> felt appropriate to me, and I've preferred the symmetry with CSP here.
>

 Could you briefly describe the "separate resource identifier" you're
referring to?

Austin.

Received on Thursday, 23 April 2015 21:45:54 UTC