- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 08:33:36 +0200
- To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- Cc: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Tanvi Vyas <tanvi@mozilla.com>, WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote: > For HSTS, the question is "Could a MITM attacker gain access to the data > otherwise" Right. > If we took away the +HSTS part > - Source document HTTP, target document HTTP > - The attacker can read the target document on the wire I see, we are assuming a HSTS setup where you do not redirect port 80. That seems rather stupid. In that case I agree you would lose out. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 27 September 2014 06:34:04 UTC