- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:46:46 -0500
- To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- CC: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On 11/3/14, 8:59 AM, Mike West wrote: > It would be good to be able to walk through the > list with a `forEach` in order to determine whether a specific Request > or Node matched an item in the list. Sure, but matchesNode is only exposed on two of these interfaces, right? And matchesURL on the third one? And then have nothing else in common. I think having a common ancestor is fine, but a union type would be fine in this case too. If there were a common method, of course, the common ancestor interface would definitely be what we want. -Boris
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 19:47:16 UTC