Re: [MIX]: Can we distinguish between images loader via `<picture>`/`srcset` and `<img>`? from Mike West on 2014-06-30 (public-webappsec@w3.org from June 2014)

From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:45:20 +0200
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Tab Atkins <tabatkins@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>
Message-ID: <CAKXHy=ft=ssrHCARFX5+WO8jXFYOQ4TGG6Bg1KMxuu+R5R=vRw@mail.gmail.com>

Does a ServiceWorker have any need to override the page's/UA's selection of
image source? If so, perhaps "ResponsiveImage" and "Image" make sense as
separate contexts. The former might need additional flags.

-mike
On Jun 30, 2014 4:22 PM, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
> > Are any specs other than MIX and the imaginary CSP update that's floating
> > around my head making use of the contexts yet?
>
> We're thinking about exposing the context (as a string) to service
> workers. https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/318 has
> details.
>
>
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>

Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 15:45:48 UTC