- From: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:37:02 -0700
- To: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Eduardo Robles Elvira <edulix@agoravoting.com>, "Hill, Brad" <bhill@paypal.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Thanks Dan, that's exactly what I was trying to say. :) On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 7/28/2014 4:54 PM, Eduardo Robles Elvira wrote: >> I wouldn't make them so bold and in-your-face, but the >> a-download-link-integrity use-case is not a corner-case. > > Brad didn't mean downloads were "borderline" interesting, he meant it > was literally "on the border" between navigation (which we don't want to > touch) and part of the application/site (which we do want to cover with > resource integrity). We could more simply not touch anything that uses > the mechanics of navigation (clicking a link) but the download case is > important and common enough to risk making the scope of the > specification less clear. Murky or not, though, we don't want to > interfere with navigation. > > -Dan Veditz >
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2014 22:37:30 UTC