I've talked to Simon Pieters on IRC (while he's vacationing), and he's fine
with this change, but would prefer that such mixed content blocking would
be integrated into the processing model.
I guess that he'd talk about it with further details once he's back.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws> wrote:
> We've discussed this over a GH issue
> <https://github.com/ResponsiveImagesCG/picture-element/issues/229>, and
> the RICG is fine with this change.
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>> > Does a ServiceWorker have any need to override the page's/UA's
>> selection of
>> > image source? If so, perhaps "ResponsiveImage" and "Image" make sense as
>> > separate contexts. The former might need additional flags.
>>
>> Would we trigger it from image-set or image() in CSS or whatever that
>> is these days as well then?
>
>
> Does anyone have usage stats for image-set/image() ?
>
>
>> Also, context has no room for flags at the
>> moment. If we should make room for that it would be good to know now.
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>>
>
>